 
|  The Independent Voice for Conservative Values and the Conscience of the Conservative Movement Less Government is the Best Government | ||||
Aurora Colorado  Shootings by Young Progressive Democrat
  Here We Go Again!
  By Scott Rohter, July  2012
 Here we go again. We are getting used to it by now. Another  senseless act of violence committed by a youth with a firearm. And another  mindless attempt to limit the rights of Americans to own handguns. One more in  a long chain of attempts to “infringe” upon “the right of the people to keep  and bear arms.” We are getting used to these incessant attempts to limit our  Constitutional Rights as well.
Here we go again. We are getting used to it by now. Another  senseless act of violence committed by a youth with a firearm. And another  mindless attempt to limit the rights of Americans to own handguns. One more in  a long chain of attempts to “infringe” upon “the right of the people to keep  and bear arms.” We are getting used to these incessant attempts to limit our  Constitutional Rights as well.
  
  There was another random attack over the weekend by an  irreligious, gun toting and obviously disturbed youth (probably a deranged  Democrat with connections to Occupy Wall Street, San Diego). The mass shooting  was perpetrated in a darkened Colorado movie theatre where patrons of the  establishment had come to view the premier showing of a Hollywood blockbuster  Movie, Batman the Dark Knight. The assailant broke in through the exit doors,  and he began firing almost immediately into the crowd of seated moviegoers.  Obviously no one else thought to carry their own personal firearm into the  theatre with them. They probably thought they were safe! Who would have suspected  that they would need to exercise their legitimate right to bear arms or concealed  carry on this particular Friday evening? Perhaps many of them had already been  brainwashed into believing that all guns are bad, and voluntarily surrendered  their right to keep and bear arms in their own minds many years ago!
  
  Whatever the case, there was inadequate security at the theatre.  The owners of the movie house were insured of course, but the insurance company  obviously did not require sufficient security measures that might have  prevented someone from busting in through the exit doors before they could be  stopped. The owner of the theatre was just in business to show a Hollywood  movie and take the public’s money of course, and to make a profit if he could,  and that as we all know is the most important thing for any business… to make a  profit.
  
   So why is the media blaming guns again for this crime  against life? They didn’t shoot all by themselves did they? It took someone to  squeeze the trigger didn’t it? It took someone else to plant the suggestion  into the murderers head didn’t it? But the lib media always tries to blame the guns  for the crime! Why not blame the insurance company for not requiring stricter  security measures be implemented before writing a commercial policy for a  public place where so many people are gathered together into such a small  space? Why not blame the City of Aurora or the State of Colorado for not  requiring stricter security measures before they issue a permit to operate such  a business, or renew their annual business license? Why blame the manufacturer  of firearms?
So why is the media blaming guns again for this crime  against life? They didn’t shoot all by themselves did they? It took someone to  squeeze the trigger didn’t it? It took someone else to plant the suggestion  into the murderers head didn’t it? But the lib media always tries to blame the guns  for the crime! Why not blame the insurance company for not requiring stricter  security measures be implemented before writing a commercial policy for a  public place where so many people are gathered together into such a small  space? Why not blame the City of Aurora or the State of Colorado for not  requiring stricter security measures before they issue a permit to operate such  a business, or renew their annual business license? Why blame the manufacturer  of firearms?
  
  Why not blame the deranged boy’s parents for not doing a  better job of raising their son. Why not hold them responsible for the  miserable job they did nurturing this young monster? Why didn’t they report  their son’s abnormal behavior to the proper authorities? But instead the Lib  Media always blames the guns and the gun manufacturers!  It is always the weapons manufacturer that  the Democrats and their European Socialist counterparts seek to go after. Why is  that?
  
  Why not blame the culture that the young sociopath grew up  in, which elevates violence in both music and film, on both the big screen, and  the TV?  That’s a very pregnant question.  Why? Why do you think? Why not put the blame squarely where it belongs? Why not  blame Hollywood, the major networks and the broadcast industry for their complicit  role in providing the viewing audience with such “fine cultural role models”  and such “uplifting family entertainment”? Talk about the Dark Knight. Let’s  talk instead about the darkside!” 
  
   Why not blame Hollywood which produces and profits from both  movies and television shows that glorify violence?  It is after all the liberal corporate news  divisions which are either owned by Hollywood interests or the national  broadcasting and entertainment networks, or in cahoots with them, that are  always screaming the loudest for gun control. Me Thinkest they protesteth too much! (much too much!) Are they  clamoring so loud for infringements on our 2nd Amendment Rights just  in order to divert attention from their own corporate business models which promote  and purvey such corrupting violence on film and television? What do you think?
Why not blame Hollywood which produces and profits from both  movies and television shows that glorify violence?  It is after all the liberal corporate news  divisions which are either owned by Hollywood interests or the national  broadcasting and entertainment networks, or in cahoots with them, that are  always screaming the loudest for gun control. Me Thinkest they protesteth too much! (much too much!) Are they  clamoring so loud for infringements on our 2nd Amendment Rights just  in order to divert attention from their own corporate business models which promote  and purvey such corrupting violence on film and television? What do you think?
  
  All of the corporate news divisions of the national broadcasting  companies are literally scrambling now over the dead and injured bodies of the  victims of Aurora, Colorado in order to broadcast the horrific images and  position themselves better to re-open the discussion about gun control in  America! “He had 6,000 rounds of  ammunition. He had high powered assault weapons. He purchased everything  legally, or on line. What can we do to prevent incidents like this from  happening in the future?” These were just some of the comments taken from  National Public Radio this weekend. “We  have to do something”, said a guest on NBC’s ‘Meet the Damn Press’. “Do we  focus on guns, or do we focus on individuals”, another voice asked?
  
  I have a novel idea. Why don’t we focus on the broadcast  networks themselves that are corrupting our youth, who own the corporate news  divisions and glorify and promote this kind of violence in the public’s mind through  their entertainment divisions? Occasionally they reach a troubled individual,  some socially deviant numskull with all of their "Hollyweird" garbage and they lay the groundwork  for these kind of atrocities to occur in our society.
  
   Along with that novel approach, I have another great idea. Why  DON’T we focus for just a minute on the individual assailant in this Colorado massacre? James Holmes is probably an angry disenchanted Democrat. Does he look like a Republican or a conservative to you with his long hair all dyed red the way that it is? He might have been a member  of Occupy Wall Street, San Diego. Apparently the Democrats aren’t moving fast  enough with all of their plans to destroy whats left of our nation's free market economic system to please all of their Party’s disgruntled  Socialists and sociopaths! I bet James Holmes  read the same Socialist propaganda in college that  President Obama read in his youth….all of the usual nonsense from Karl Marx, Saul  Alinsky, Bill Ayers, and others.  I have  an idea. Why don’t we just prevent  Democrats from owning firearms instead  of trying to take guns out of the hands of law abiding Republicans and conservatives and other citizens   so they can’t defend themselves? Why don’t we take guns  and ammunition out of the hands of ignorant, idealistic members of Occupy Wall  Street and other disgruntled Socialist-progressives and keep any of these types  from ever being elected to Congress or the White House in the future? Oh I  guess that would eliminate President Obama wouldn’t it? Darn it!
Along with that novel approach, I have another great idea. Why  DON’T we focus for just a minute on the individual assailant in this Colorado massacre? James Holmes is probably an angry disenchanted Democrat. Does he look like a Republican or a conservative to you with his long hair all dyed red the way that it is? He might have been a member  of Occupy Wall Street, San Diego. Apparently the Democrats aren’t moving fast  enough with all of their plans to destroy whats left of our nation's free market economic system to please all of their Party’s disgruntled  Socialists and sociopaths! I bet James Holmes  read the same Socialist propaganda in college that  President Obama read in his youth….all of the usual nonsense from Karl Marx, Saul  Alinsky, Bill Ayers, and others.  I have  an idea. Why don’t we just prevent  Democrats from owning firearms instead  of trying to take guns out of the hands of law abiding Republicans and conservatives and other citizens   so they can’t defend themselves? Why don’t we take guns  and ammunition out of the hands of ignorant, idealistic members of Occupy Wall  Street and other disgruntled Socialist-progressives and keep any of these types  from ever being elected to Congress or the White House in the future? Oh I  guess that would eliminate President Obama wouldn’t it? Darn it!
  
  The other day one of those pompous Socialist-progressives  from England on the B.B.C. with a degree in journalism from Oxford no doubt,  was opining on their State owned radio that, “Americans have a profound  misunderstanding of our own Second Amendment.” This royal Pommie subject of  the British crown determined that he knew better what our Second Amendment meant  than  we do, or our own Nation’s Founding Fathers did! Perhaps our  Founders meant to say something other than what they actually penned down when  they wrote, “The Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall NOT be  infringed!” (extra punctuation added) He went on to say, “What makes you  Americans think that you as individuals have a right to bear arms?” Isn’t it  just like one of those “cocky Pommie sops” from the B.B.C.  to try to tell us what our own Constitution means?
  
  I think it is characteristic of all Socialists and all  Socialist governments everywhere, all across the world to try to prevent their  people from owning the means wherewith they can defend themselves. Socialists have  a profound desire to make sure that guns cannot be sold in their countries,  whether they are to citizens, or to subjects, or to just plain victims of their  own State tyranny. Do the subjects of the British Crown  have the right to own  guns? Do the citizen subjects of the British Commonwealth in Canada, or  Australia, or New Zealand or in any other member nation of the Commonwealth? What  about in France? Can citizens of Thoreau’s ‘Socialist’ Republic of France  possess firearms? Not likely! What about in the “hard core” Socialist countries  like Russia, China, or Cuba, or Venezuala? What is the likelihood that people  in those countries can have free and unfettered access to the firearms that  they need to defend themselves? If the people of Norway would have been able to  easily access personal firearms for self protection then it is highly unlikely that young Anders Breivik could have taken the  lives of so many little children of the members of the Norwegian Parliament at   their summer camp on Utoya Island last year.
have the right to own  guns? Do the citizen subjects of the British Commonwealth in Canada, or  Australia, or New Zealand or in any other member nation of the Commonwealth? What  about in France? Can citizens of Thoreau’s ‘Socialist’ Republic of France  possess firearms? Not likely! What about in the “hard core” Socialist countries  like Russia, China, or Cuba, or Venezuala? What is the likelihood that people  in those countries can have free and unfettered access to the firearms that  they need to defend themselves? If the people of Norway would have been able to  easily access personal firearms for self protection then it is highly unlikely that young Anders Breivik could have taken the  lives of so many little children of the members of the Norwegian Parliament at   their summer camp on Utoya Island last year.
  
  What do all of these countries have in common? They are all  Socialist societies with liberal Socialist Labor governments, based on Marxian  ideology! Now watch in America as the liberal progressives and the mainstream  media Network Broadcast Companies through their corporate news divisions try to  position themselves to use this latest unfortunate incident in Colorado to  re-open the discussion in America over gun control. And it comes right at the  same time that the United Nations Treaty on Arms Control is the subject of  Congressional debate in the U.S. Senate. – Just all a big coincidence I am sure! 
  Original News Sources
  http://rt.com/usa/news/death-petalty-batman-shooting-857/
  http://www.zimbio.com/James+Holmes/articles/IIyohuXcmIy/Suspected+Batman+Shooter+James+Holmes+Custody
  http://www.zimbio.com/James+Holmes/articles/TyYSVEJYehe/James+Holmes+Alleged+Shooter+Family+Issues
  http://newsone.com/2026241/james-holmes-dark-knight-shooter/
  http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/batman-massacre-police-reveal-killers-1153712
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/20/james-holmes-dark-knight-theater-shooting_n_1688944.html
  Note : A Comment posted to and taken from the previous link  above 
  
  7/20/2012 
  
  ABC News has issued a formal apology and clarification of an  earlier report that incorrectly stated that a Jim Holmes of a Colorado Tea  Party organization might be the suspect in the fatal shootings at a Aurora,  Colo., movie theater early Friday morning.
  
  "ABC News and  Brian Ross apologize for the mistake, and for disseminating that information  before it was properly vetted," the network said in a correction posted to  its website.
  
  As speculation mounts  about the motive behind the mass shooting, one private investigator has said  that Holmes may have been part of Occupy Wall Street’s most violent faction,  Occupy Black Bloc.
  
  Bill Warner told how  the Batman movie portrays the OWS crowd in a negative vein, leading him to  believe that may have been a cause behind the gunman’s rage.” 
  
  http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Colo-massacre-suspect-mum-as-he-heads-to-court-3727072.php
| "The truth, the political truth, and nothing but the political truth.  A journalist has no better friend than the truth." - Scott Rohter |  |